���������¼�

A survey of more than 1000 refugees has shown only permanent protection visas are linked to mental health and social benefits.

���������¼� psychologists have compared the long-term psychological and social consequences of changing visa status, showing that any form of temporary visa is associated with worse mental health in refugees compared to permanent secure visas.

The findings, published in the , have important policy implications, including the value of providing permanent protection to as many refugees as possible.

Along with study partners at Australian Red Cross and SSI, and Phoenix Australia, University of Melbourne, the ���������¼� team investigated how refugees’ mental health developed after a change from low security visas (e.g. bridging visa) to medium security visas (e.g. temporary protection visa) or high security visas (permanent residency).

The ���������¼� researchers  that permanent visas are better for refugees’ mental health – but up until this study, they didn’t know whether the medium security afforded by temporary protection visas had any benefits over low security visas.

“The findings of our world-first study have confirmed that permanent visas for refugees are associated with improved depression symptoms and social adaptation, like feeling less isolation and loneliness – but crucially, this was not the case for temporary protection visas,” says lead author, ���������¼� Professor Angela Nickerson.

“Our results suggest that remaining in a state of prolonged insecurity may be associated with poorer long-term mental health outcomes. This highlights the critical importance of safety and security in the resettlement environment to facilitate good adaptation amongst refugees.”

Refugees around the world live in various states of insecurity, ranging from low levels to high levels of security.

“Because the number of permanent settlement places globally are so limited, many refugees around the world live in a state of low security without permanent settlement, with reduced rights and restricted access to employment, financial support, education or health care,” says ���������¼� co-author, Associate Professor Belinda Liddell.

“At the time this study was conducted, temporary protection visas offered a medium level of security in Australia: visa holders were recognised as refugees and could typically access basic health, financial, education and social services, but were required to periodically re-apply for protection and could not access family reunification pathways.

“But we didn’t know whether the medium level of security afforded by temporary protection visas translated into better mental health outcomes for refugees compared to low security visas.”

Survey shows effect of level of security

The researchers surveyed 1021 Arabic, Farsi, Tamil or English-speaking refugees or asylum seekers living in Australia who had taken part in a longitudinal study investigating refugee mental health over eight time points from 2015 to 2020.

They analysed if a change in visa status was associated with changes in depression, social adaptation – measured through feelings of isolation, loneliness and boredom – and immigration-related fears, such as the fear of being deported.

“If temporary visas are indeed giving refugees a sense of security, as is often claimed, we would expect that moving from low to medium visa security would be associated with significant improvements in these measures,” A/Prof. Liddell says.

“However, we found there was no change in depression symptoms between those who transitioned to medium visa security and those who maintained low visa security.”

The researchers also found that there was no significant difference in social difficulties between those who changed to a medium visa security and those who remained in the low security group.

A/Prof. Liddell says the researchers were somewhat surprised by these findings. 

“But they also make sense, because ultimately, a medium security visa is still only a temporary status – up until recently, in Australia, people had confirm their refugee status regularly through visa reapplication,” she says.

“And crucially, temporary visa holders still face the possibility of deportation, a possibility of having to return to a country of origin where there are fears for safety, and prolonged family separation. It's very difficult and distressing for people, and not a durable solution for anyone.”

A/Prof. Liddell says living without basic security affects the core understanding of who you are as a person and how you see yourself.

“Temporary status and depression are remarkably similar – with both, you don't see a future for yourself. You have this sense of hopelessness and feeling stuck. It's kind of a limbo, you can't go forward and can't go back. Our research shows that even medium levels of security visas carry those implications.”