黑料网大事记

Plastic packaging plays an indispensable role in modern food systems, protecting produce during transport and extending shelf life to ensure food security. Yet this essential function creates a critical dilemma: the very material that prevents food waste has become one of South Asia鈥檚 most severe environmental threats.

The scale of the crisis is severe - , only marginally below the . Across South Asian nations, most plastic waste ends up burned in open fires or scattered across landscapes, with lightweight food packaging among the most problematic waste streams.

This widespread mismanagement contaminates soil systems, pollutes water bodies from rivers to oceans, and ultimately threatens our food production systems.

The urgency of this crisis intensifies with the . The treaty discussions are focusing on critical aspects such as phasing out non-essential plastic uses while recognising that some applications may require transitional approaches.

The treaty framework emphasises identifying alternatives for non-critical uses and establishing robust waste management systems for necessary applications. This balanced approach acknowledges both environmental imperatives and practical realities of food security in the region.

Why Plastic Packaging Cannot Be Ignored

Plastic packaging serves critical functions in food systems that cannot be overlooked:

  • Provides superior shelf-life extension

  • Maintains essential barrier properties

  • Ensures food quality standards

  • Enhances marketing appeal

  • Significantly reduces food loss during transport and storage

Eliminating plastic packaging entirely would be neither practical nor beneficial for food security.

Instead, the challenge requires a dual approach: using plastic packaging where it genuinely prevents food waste while simultaneously developing robust systems to manage the resulting plastic waste.

This means accepting that some plastic use remains necessary for food security but ensuring that every piece of plastic entering the food system has a clear end-of-life pathway through improved collection, recycling, and processing infrastructure.

Strategic Measures for Balance

  1. Avoidance and Prevention
    The primary strategy should focus on eliminating unnecessary plastic packaging wherever possible. Prevention remains the most effective step in reducing plastic waste. For instance, polystyrene foam netting commonly used in fruit transport - a material rarely recycled in Sri Lanka - can be replaced with viable alternatives such as paper wool, natural fibres, or moulded packaging trays with individual compartments that securely hold each fruit and prevent damage during transport. The treaty framework specifically encourages such substitutions where alternatives can maintain product integrity.

  2. Multi-Stakeholder Collaboration
    Effective solutions require producers, manufacturers, and consumers to collaborate in identifying where plastic packaging remains essential versus where alternatives can serve. This involves systematic evaluation of safety standards, preservation requirements, and available substitutes across different food categories. Creating regular dialogue forums enables stakeholders to understand each other's operational challenges. When packaging manufacturers understand waste management sorting limitations, they can design better recyclable products. Similarly, when food producers understand consumer behaviour patterns, they can make more informed packaging choices.

  3. Material Innovation
    The promotion of natural materials presents significant opportunities where they can maintain food quality and prevent waste. Proven alternatives including glass, paper, and metal packaging exist for various applications. The introduction of bioplastics offers additional pathways, though successful implementation requires ensuring that waste sorting, collection, and processing systems are properly established with adequate community awareness about proper disposal of these materials.

  4. Design for Recyclability
    Improved packaging design focusing on recyclability can transform waste management outcomes. Avoiding difficult-to-recycle materials wherever possible and paying attention to details such as label materials and adhesives can significantly impact recycling processes. Small design considerations often make the difference between materials that can be effectively recycled and those that contaminate recycling streams.

  5. Infrastructure Investment
    Critical infrastructure gaps present perhaps the most significant challenge. Without proper downstream solutions for collection, sorting, and processing, even the most innovative upstream efforts in design and material selection fail to achieve circular economy goals. The region requires substantial investment in waste management infrastructure to collect sorted materials and add value through processing and recycling operations. Treaty implementation will likely include financing mechanisms to support infrastructure development in developing regions.

  6. Policy and Systemic Change
    Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) programs create crucial incentives for improved packaging design and waste management. These policy mechanisms ensure producers take responsibility for end-of-life management of their products while encouraging innovation in sustainable packaging.

Both behavioural changes among consumers and systemic changes in production and manufacturing practices are essential for achieving circular economy goals in the food packaging sector.

Credit: 黑料网大事记 Centre for Sustainable Development Reform

The Critical Role of Data

The importance of data emerges as a recurring theme in addressing plastic packaging challenges. Robust data systems for tracking plastic flows, recycling rates, and waste management outcomes are essential for evidence-based policymaking. Without accurate tracking of plastic flows 鈥 from production through disposal 鈥 policymakers operate in the dark, unable to assess which interventions succeed or where resources should be directed.聽

This data deficit undermines strategic planning and investment decisions. For instance, without knowing which types of plastic packaging dominate waste streams, designing targeted recycling infrastructure becomes extremely difficult. Similarly, measuring the effectiveness of reduction initiatives requires baseline data that many countries currently lack.

Countries will need verifiable data to set realistic targets, monitor compliance, and demonstrate progress.

Establishing robust data systems now will determine whether treaty commitments translate into meaningful environmental improvements or remain aspirational statements.

Scaling Through Collaboration

Integrated approaches to addressing the problem require breaking down silos and building strategic partnerships across the value chain. Key elements include:

  • Multi-stakeholder platforms that facilitate understanding of challenges and opportunities across sectors

  • Aligned economic incentives through shared value models - packaging manufacturers could receive credits for designing recyclable products, while food producers might benefit from reduced waste management fees when using sustainable packaging

  • Knowledge transfer mechanisms enabling successful pilots from one country to be adapted across the region

Digital infrastructure can serve to connect stakeholders across borders, facilitate real-time sharing of best practices, create databases of successful innovations, and enable matchmaking between food producers seeking sustainable solutions and packaging manufacturers offering innovative alternatives.

The Path Forward

Transitioning from isolated national efforts to integrated regional strategies where knowledge, resources, and infrastructure are shared for collective impact represents the most viable pathway for scaling circular solutions in the food sector.

The fundamental insight remains clear: sustainable food systems cannot be achieved without addressing the plastic waste crisis.

Solutions exist but require collective will, regional collaboration, and systemic thinking to implement at scale. The path forward involves maintaining the benefits of plastic packaging for food security while dramatically improving waste management systems through integrated, data-driven approaches that unite all stakeholders in pursuit of truly circular food systems.

The insights presented in this article were highlighted by the author Randika Jayasinghe (CSDR GOAP Fellow), during her contributions to the panel session 鈥淐ircular Solutions: Boosting Resource Efficiency鈥 at the 鈥淏eyond Waste: Optimising food, water and energy for better nutrition in South Asia鈥 conference. This conference, held on 18-19 June 2025 in Colombo, Sri Lanka, was hosted by SAPLING (South Asian Policy Leadership for Improved Nutrition and Growth) 鈥 a dynamic regional platform led by the World Bank that brings together experts to explore transformative solutions for sustainable food systems 鈥 and co-organised by the Prime Minister鈥檚 office of Sri Lanka. The panel, moderated by Anar Bhatt (WRI India), also featured Sumit Pokhrel (Asian Development Bank), Susanne Bodach (IWMI), and Kristin Pei Kagetsu (Saathi Eco Innovations).