ºÚÁÏÍø´óʼÇ

Using Artificial Intelligence (AI) in university

Find out how you can use AI ethically and responsibly in your assessments and studies
Personalise
Two students on their laptops

Learn about our stance on Artificial Intelligence (AI)

ºÚÁÏÍø´óÊÂ¼Ç recognises there are ethical and responsible uses of AI and generative AI (GenAI) tools that can support student learning. AI can be a helpful tool for tasks, such as initial research, summarising information, data analysis and more.

However, when it comes to completing independent research, coursework and assessments, it's important to ensure the work you produce is your own. The university adopts a firm approach to ensuring you complete the work that is expected and that this demonstrates you have met learning outcomes assigned within your courses.

The degree to which you can use AI varies between faculties, programs and courses. Reach out to your course convenor, lecturer or tutor to understand the rules and expectations.

Unsure about using AI in your work?

When using AI in your assessment, a simple principle to remember is:

If you are given permission and wish to use AI in the process of planning, designing, or writing your assessment, you should always clearly acknowledge this.

Responsible use of Generative AI tools

As an early adopter, ºÚÁÏÍø´óÊÂ¼Ç supports and nurtures the ethical and responsible use of AI in research, learning, teaching, administration, and thought leadership. See our principles below on the ethical and responsible use of Artificial Intelligence at ºÚÁÏÍø´óʼÇ:

  1. The use of AI systems at ºÚÁÏÍø´óÊÂ¼Ç benefits ºÚÁÏÍø´óʼÇ, individuals, society, and the environment.
  2. The use of AI systems at ºÚÁÏÍø´óÊÂ¼Ç is equitable, and respectful of human rights, diversity, inclusivity, and accessibility.
  3. AI systems and their lifecycle at ºÚÁÏÍø´óÊÂ¼Ç are trustworthy and are used responsibly, safely, and reliably in accordance with their intended purpose.
  4. The use of AI systems is transparent, and people understand when the AI system is engaging with or impacting them, the environment, and/or society.
  5. AI systems and their lifecycle used at ºÚÁÏÍø´óÊÂ¼Ç are identifiable, explainable, interpretable, accountable, and contestable.
  6. AI systems and their lifecycle used at ºÚÁÏÍø´óÊÂ¼Ç are secure and resilient.

When using AI, remember to:

  • Check your course guidelines to see if the use of AI is permitted, including its usage as a translation tool. See the levels of AI assistance and what they entail 
  • Maintain your academic integrity. Do not copy and paste AI-generated materials and claim them as your own. Learn how to reference AI in your assessments
  • Protect personal information. Do not include any personal or sensitive information in prompts, your own or other people's (i.e. addresses, name, emails, zID or intellectual property). For data privacy and protection, use Microsoft Copilot using your ºÚÁÏÍø´óÊÂ¼Ç account
  • Verify accuracy of AI outputs. GenAI tools could produce invalid or unreliable information ('fabrications' or 'hallucinations'). Book an appointment with the Academic Skills team if you need guidance. 

Levels of AI assistance 

The Levels of AI Assistance framework is designed to help convenors communicate to students how much, or how little AI can be used in the process of planning, creating and producing an assignment. To ensure clarity in ºÚÁÏÍø´óÊÂ¼Ç AI policy, and how to use AI responsibly in your assessments, we've created this resource for further guidance. Download the framework or read below.

  • This assessment is designed for you to complete without the use of any generative AI.  You are not permitted to use any generative AI tools, software or service to search for or generate information or answers.

  • In completing this assessment, you are permitted to use standard editing and referencing functions in the software you use to complete your assessment (for example Microsoft Word, Mendeley, Zotero).

    You are not allowed to use any generative AI tools including prompts or features that generate text. Using functions that generate or paraphrase passages of text or other media, whether based on your own work or not, can be grounds for academic misconduct.

  • This category permits the use of generative AI as ‘inspiration’ for assessment. For example, generating initial ideas, structures, or outlines. Beyond that, the use of generative AI is prohibited.

    You are permitted to use generative AI tools, software or services to generate initial ideas, structures, or outlines only. After you've used generative AI for inspiration you must develop those ideas to produce your own work.

  • This category permits the use of generative AI as a 'coach'. Learning usually takes effort. In recognition of this, this category requires you to make a first attempt at the task yourself. Once this is done you can use generative AI to improve your submission. The focus is on your thoughts and creation with the AI helping you edit your work.

    The AI-based edit must be attributed, and this reinforces the responsible use of generative AI in a scholarly context. The degree of referencing or attribution may vary on the nature of the task – from general acknowledgement to full attribution of all editing suggestions. Your Convenor will specify the types of attribution required, as well as when generative AI tools can be used throughout the assessment.

    Keep copies of your drafts as your convenor may also request them as part of the submission

    If outputs of generative AI tools, software or services form part of your submission and are not appropriately attributed, your Convenor may ask you to explain your work. If you are unable to satisfactorily demonstrate your understanding of your submission and how you have done it you may be referred to ºÚÁÏÍø´óÊÂ¼Ç Conduct & Integrity Office for investigation for academic misconduct and possible penalties.

  • This assessment is designed for you to use generative AI as part of the assessed learning outcomes.  Please refer to the assessment instructions for more details.

    This category expects a wide range of use of generative AI in assessment. Your convenor will specify what they want you to do with generative AI. This may include assessments where a first draft is generated by generative AI and you are asked to critique that draft; it may be an assessment where a particular generative AI tool is required to be used; or it may be an assessment where you have options to use or not use those tools.

  • This assessment would not likely require or benefit from the use of AI. However, if you do use it, it must be properly referenced.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

  • Read your assessment instructions carefully to understand what level of AI use is permitted, and note that what is permitted will vary across different assessments.

    • At some points in your learning, it will be important to assess your understanding without the use of AI tools.
    • At other points, you may be assessed on how well you have learnt to use the tools.

    Your convenors will set the level of acceptable use of AI for each assessment based on course learning outcomes.

  • The unauthorised or unacknowledged use of AI in assessments is a form of cheating and is considered to be student misconduct at ºÚÁÏÍø´óÊÂ¼Ç under the current Code of Conduct and Values. If you have been found to use AI in a manner that does not meet the course instructions, penalties may occur which would include a fail, a mark of zero for the course, suspension or permanent exclusion.

  • All academics marking assessments submitted through either Moodle Turnitin Assignment or Inspera now have access to . This provides academics with an estimated percentage of text that has similarities to AI-generated or AI-paraphrased text (text that was originally written by AI but then rewritten to avoid detection). The document will include highlights of the relevant passages that the detector has flagged. 

    This is not always conclusive evidence that a student has inappropriately used generative AI, however, this will be a flag for a marker to further review a student’s submission.

    It’s important that students are aware of what tools use generative AI and may be inappropriate in an assessment. For example, Grammarly, Quillbot and translation tools such as Google Translate, DeepL and Baidu Translate are forms of generative AI. 

  • When using AI tools, such as ChatGPT or Copilot, it's important to properly cite and credit use. Acknowledging the use of AI when you have used it helps ensure the honesty and integrity of your work. 

    In cases where the use of AI has been prohibited, please respect this and be aware that where unauthorised use is detected, penalties may apply.

  • If you need help with your assessments, there are alternatives to unauthorised AI use. You can:

    • Seek support from your teacher if you’re under too much pressure or apply for Special Consideration if you’re eligible, or
    • Seek help from the by booking a consultation, attending a Study Hacks session, or exploring our toolkit to see our available resources.
  • Translation tools automatically convert text or speech from one language to another. Some popular tools include ChatGPT, Copilot, Google Translate and DeepL Translator. Acceptable use varies by course, so check assessment guidelines or consult teaching staff if you’re unsure. 

    It is essential to create and express your own ideas in assessments. Misusing tools, such as copying outputs from ChatGPT and claiming them as your own, undermines your ability to demonstrate a genuine understanding of course material.

    Spelling and grammar checks, like those in Microsoft Word, are generally acceptable as they don’t alter the meaning of your work. However, verify suggested changes, as editing tools can unintentionally distort your understanding. Some programs, like Google Docs, include AI editing features that may generate or refine text. If AI tools such as ChatGPT or Grammarly are used where permitted, you must reference or acknowledge them. Keep draft versions of your work to show your process if concerns about validity arise.

  • ºÚÁÏÍø´óÊÂ¼Ç acknowledges that these tools can sometimes support learning but warns that inappropriate use may hinder English language development. Many multilingual students note that translating writing into English can negatively affect learning and reduce originality. For example, dictating in one language and translating into English often results in AI-generated text that lacks nuance or fails to convey the intended meaning. 

    Additionally, relying on translation tools may pose challenges if your work is flagged as AI-generated, requiring you to explain ideas that may not fully reflect your understanding. 

    Always check assessment guidelines to confirm whether AI translation tools are permitted in your course.

  • If your Convenor has concerns that your submission contains passages of AI-generated text or media, you may be asked to have a conversation about your work.

    If you are unable to satisfactorily demonstrate your understanding of your submission, you may be referred to ºÚÁÏÍø´óÊÂ¼Ç Conduct & Integrity Office for investigation for academic misconduct and possible penalties.

Have a question?

If you have any questions about ºÚÁÏÍø´óÊÂ¼Ç AI policy or referencing AI in university, we’re here to help.